New Jersey State Bar Association
Bergen County Bar Association

Reduction in Child Support After New Jersey Divorce

Kid Playing With ToysIn a recent non-binding New Jersey appellate decision, a mother appealed an order reducing the amount of child support paid by the father. The couple married in 1995 and also in 2003. In 2010, they entered into a property settlement agreement that was incorporated into their final divorce judgment. They had three kids who were minors as of 2015. The settlement agreement provided that they would have joint legal custody, with the mother being the parent of primary residence. The father had parenting time as well as overnights.

The child support was supposed to include daycare, lessons, and any other expenses, and it was $2,400 each month. The parents didn't use the New Jersey Child Support Guidelines to calculate child support.

The child support provision in the settlement agreement was more than what was available under the Guidelines. It also provided that there were certain events that would result in the termination of child support and provided that child support could be changed, with resort to mediation before litigation. The father was supposed to give the children health insurance and take the kids as tax deductions.

However, the parents were planning to contribute equally to post-secondary education expenses. The mother was to receive $1,020 in alimony, which would stop when her youngest child became 18 years old, either of them died, or she remarried.

In 2015, the mother asked for sole custody, since the father didn't exercise his parenting time. She also wanted child support to be increased. The father opposed and asked for a modification of child support. He said that he didn't have overnights and that the mother wasn't incurring costs of daycare or lessons. The mother responded by asking for a cost of living increase in child support.

The mother's request for sole custody was denied. The court ultimately issued an order reducing child support to about half of what had been ordered previously. This order was based on a substantial change of circumstances in that the father no longer had overnight visits and incurred a cost for health insurance. The calculation was now based on the Guidelines, using the father's 2014 income and imputed income for the mother. The judge told the mother he was required to follow the Guidelines and called the mother's claim that the child support wouldn't be enough for three children "equitable arguments."

The mother appealed, arguing that the reduction put the children in severe financial distress. For the first time, she also argued that the property settlement agreement only included five reasons for a reduction in child support, and the plaintiff's obligation to pay the kids' health insurance wasn't one of them. The father argued that the reduction was supported by the Guidelines.

The appellate court explained that a settlement agreement is a contract. It also found there was a change of circumstances that warranted a review of how much child support was being paid. The father's salary had gone up, and he was no longer doing overnights. However, it also found that nothing in the agreement showed the parties rejected the standard that an application to modify child support had to show a change of circumstances that warranted a modification.

The appellate court agreed the trial court was to use the Guidelines in determining a new amount of child support. However, the lower court had made a mistake in not considering whether the mother had shown good cause to deviate from the Guidelines. When a deviation is ordered, it has to explicitly consider factors under N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23(a) and the best interests of the children. That didn't happen in this case. No consideration was made of the children's current expenses, for example. The case was reversed and sent back to the lower court.

If you are considering a divorce in Bergen County, and you are concerned about child support obligations or visitation, it is important to retain an experienced and aggressive child support attorney to seek an appropriate outcome. Contact the lawyers of Leopold Law at (201) 345-5907 or through our online form. We have attorneys available who can handle all aspects of a divorce.

Client Reviews
"I had a legal issue with a contract and Mr. Leopold was nothing but truthful, just and honest about how I should proceed with my case. The guidance I received was nothing short of exceptional. I would have no issue whatsoever with recommending him to anyone who needs legal advice or services. He is your man if you need a keen legal eye watching out for you." Iam E.
"Howard gave me the courage to stand up for myself. He showed me the person I could be and encouraged me to make decisions with a healthy future in mind. " Chloe
"Howard went above and beyond for me. He responded to emails, texts, and calls day and night and was aggressive in Court. I am grateful for all his efforts." Pia